RBCWiki talk:Administration

From Ravenblack CityWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

As some already know, some kind of pages (eg. RBCWiki:Administration/Guidelines) are coming from the mighty UDWiki. I'd rather have our own version, so I hope this stuff will get stripped down (Yes down!) to the necessary. It would be nice if there weren't so many rules necessary. Maybe the future makes this possible. We will see. But still, someone(s) need to have an opinion about this and also need to be willing to do something, because I am uncomfortable to have content which wasn't written by you or me in here.

I can also imagine, erasing all that content that wasn't written by us (reboot that also) maybe modify the starting points (like this talk pages front page). If I need to, because I get asked to, I will do anyways. The more rules, the more it needs maintenance. And I don't see that many users on this wiki. --Cliff Burton Marco 23:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Please Discuss: Let's hear your thoughts

We do need to start a basic guideline of what it means to be a wiki administrator so the new reboot candidates can know what they are getting themselves into. This should be an open forum where all can have their pages but the moderators need to know when to step in and when to keep their paws off. I can start a basic guide from what you and I have talked about in the past, but you know it always comes down to you, cliff--DE 07:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. --Cliff Burton Marco 13:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
A preliminary version of the guidelines has been sent to cliffburton to review and discuss with others to come up with code of conduct for sysops and bureaucrats--DE 15:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
As you know, I have read your ideas and taken them into my thoughts. The Admin Reboot followed the Policy Reboot, and right now I am downgrading/shrinking/watchacallit the policies. Still, I need to get some more input on how to do it. Take a look at the Suggestions page.
Personal tools
advertising