Talk:Main Page

From Ravenblack CityWiki

Archived discussions are found here.

Please use this page for discussing the improvement of the Main Page only.
You might wanna use General Discussion, Wiki Questions or the FAQ if you have questions or suggestions regarding the improvement of the wiki.

Improvement / change of the Main Page

It happend... if you have resentments against the changes... suggestions to make... I am eager to read them. --Cliff Burton • Marco 21:38, 21 January 2011 (CET)

Your thoughts below...

Glow

I love it. Good job, Marco! --Bry ^{talk † vamp} 14:24, 9 February 2011 (CET)

Fangs. Good to know. --Cliff Burton • Marco 15:50, 9 February 2011 (CET)

I like most of the changes a lot... not real fond of the font color for the first words in the news and gossip sections on the right though --Miranda Dawn 05:23, 11 February 2011 (CET)

The glow does look neat; and yes, some of the colours are hard to read, though that doesn't really bother me much. However, I think there's a little too much glow :P Wouldn't it be better to keep it for the more important titles/topics only, on the Main Page? lest we look like rabid Twilighters. --Cora ^{-talk | vamp-} 13:11, 11 February 2011 (CET)

We'll see :) I know sometimes less is more. But that's why I asked. I need opinions. --Cliff Burton • Marco 19:30, 11 February 2011 (CET)

I used Internet Explorer so it wasn't until Cliff twisted my arm that I got to see it with glow. I like it. I can read it fine and theirs not too much glow on the main page. It's just 2 small headers. I think it will be ok and is a good example to new comers of the possiblities of this wiki. --Lord Galamushi • don't talk to me 21:30, 11 February 2011 (CET)

Personally I feel as though the amount of glowing text on the main page is slightly overwhelming. It does look nice but it's a bit much. -- G/Upir ^Talk 20:37, 12 February 2011 (CET)

As you can see, I am not that stubborn.. so I dimmed the glowing to a minimum. No more eye cancer :) --Cliff Burton • Marco 22:09, 18 February 2011 (CET)

This is so much better. I never even considered it would be possible to just dim the glow! Thank you, Marco <3 --Cora ^{-talk | vamp-} 14:00, 19 February 2011 (CET)

New Font of the logos and headlines

I don't know... somehow this font looks pretty cool, but maybe a bit too cool. I think I might switch it back. What do you peebs think? --Cliff Burton • Marco 08:33, 10 February 2011 (CET)

1. I changed the topic, was abit misleading I have to admit. Because I was speaking of the new RBCpedia Logo. I always thought more about RBCpedia as the name for the project/site. But on the other hand I am always referring to it as The Wiki or RBCwiki, because it is shorter. So I will use that too, and definately for the Wikis own namespace which is RBCWiki.
2. Most of you won't have seen the interim logos I made. I will show an example of them here, later.
3. Now you can tell me about the new logos :)

I seen most of your art work as it was being tested and hope I was of help with the awsome new look you got going now on the main page. You put a lot of work into it and I think it looks great and thank you very much for all the effort and sleepless nights it took to make. --Lord Galamushi • don't talk to me 21:24, 11 February 2011 (CET)

New Signatur Font

The font is cool and I like the colors too... I made a banner one time for someone else with that font (chiller, right?) and those exact colors too. I'd keep it if I was you ;) --Miranda Dawn 05:25, 11 February 2011 (CET)

Yeah, keep it :) It's rippin'! --Cora ^{-talk | vamp-} 13:13, 11 February 2011 (CET)

I have to say, shame on me, always playing with fonts, for the most part of my life, creating my onw 1988 on the Amiga computer and even earlier with pencil and paper... I never heard of that font. Credits for showing me the font I have to give to beloved :D Sam Galamushi. That is also the reason the two sigs look alike. I tried to make the best of it, and so I thought to give something back by creating his one. I tried red for his, but it was a bit too blurry. So the copycat is me. I think I feel obligated to say that. --Cliff Burton • Marco 19:22, 11 February 2011 (CET)

Funny enough it's a font I been using for years but I am happy you like it. Thanks for the help with my sig. >:) --Lord Galamushi • don't talk to me 21:20, 11 February 2011 (CET)